Compilers hail and farewell.
This is a belated “Thank You” to
Donald Bain, who is having what I
hope is just a sabbatical from the
Flag; Donald has been a Compiler for
about two years. The late Alex
Ewing put me back in touch with him
when I inherited the editorship of
the SI, and between contributions to
the Flag and to the SI, it has been
a fruitful relationship. I will
still be asking him for
contributions to the SI!
I am pleased to welcome another two
Compilers, which brings the strength
back up to five; Jennifer Dunn, who
writes every month in the SI has
agreed to be a Compiler. Jennifer
is now a Councillor in Glasgow. The
other new Compiler is Mark Hirst;
Mark is the Parliamentary Researcher
for Christine Grahame MSP. Both
Compilers definitely have one
quality I lack, and will never now
attain; it is known as Youth.
Brown’s Black and Blue Thursday.
As the New Labour project
spectacularly unravelled last week,
with an ashen faced Gordon Brown
accepting it was his responsibility,
I managed not to have any sneaking
sympathetic thoughts about his
plight.
It
is doubly ironic that the bale of
straw that broke this camel’s back
was one that Brown had bound up
himself, in one of his last acts as
Chancellor of the Exchequer (I
mistyped the word Chancellor, and it
came out as “Chancellot” – a
Freudian slip if there ever was
one.) His tinkering with the 10%
tax rate at the beginning of last
year, as he sought to cosy up to
Middle England, was only another
symptom of how far he has strayed
from socialist ideals in pursuit of
personal glory. What I find bizarre
is that people – normally Labour
supporters – will say “He was a
brilliant Chancellor…….”
Let us consider that in the light
of the recent strike at Grangemouth;
it transpires that at that port, all
the oil and gas from the Forties
Field came ashore. This was the
equivalent of one third of the take
from the North Sea; it was stated
that there would be a loss to the
Exchequer of £25 million per day.
Now £25 million a day equates to
over £9 billion a year – Yes -
BILLION! Multiply that by three,
and we are looking at £27 billion of
revenue from oil every year.(The
Scottish Parliament annual budget is
£30 billion).
So over and above all the other
taxation revenue, the United Kingdom
has almost £30 billion a year
buckshee – found money – which is
there by luck, not skill or
enterprise, but luck, and it has
been flowing from the North Sea for
over 30 years.
I wait for someone to explain how
this wonderful competent Chancellor
has managed to get the UK into a
cumulative deficit of £581 billion,
remembering also that (unlike
Norway) no oil money has been
salted away for a rainy day.
IS NO NEWS GOOD NEWS?
A recent report by the BBC Trust (is
that an oxymoron?) has discovered
that there is very little coverage
by the BBC of events outside
England, and contrary to their
beliefs, Scotland is outside
England.
We
have been accustomed to this
attitude for so long that we have
become institutionalised in a
broadcasting sense, and it does not
infuriate us, as it should. Two
things in this past week have
focused my attention; every week I
play snooker with a group of
friends, all fellow septuagenarians,
and conversation in the car ranges
over sport and sketchily over
politics. I say sketchily, as I am
the only SNP member; last week, one
of them was bemoaning how house
prices were falling with dire
predictions of negative equity. He
was quite surprised when I pointed
out that all of us, and most of our
families, lived in Scotland, and
that house prices in Scotland were
actually rising. I do not know
which programmes he watched on TV,
but he was convinced that things
were bad on the property front, as
they are in England.
Then on Sunday evening, my wife and
I were watching Scottish
Television, the one where various
people hold up an STV sign at the
start of programmes, when along
comes the News; it was ITN, and as
usual there was no Scottish news.
My wife said “There’s no Scottish
news on Sundays”, and I agreed. But
there is – our broadcasters just do
not cover it – and it is time we
asserted ourselves. Put it another
way, the result of Hibs against
Rangers was of greater interest
North of the Border than Chelsea or
whoever against whoever, but that is
what we got.
THE
BIG ISSUE
I have to say that the Politics Show
on BBC on Sundays is normally quite
interesting, and this past week was
quite stimulating; we had First
Minister Alex Salmond reacting to
the English and Welsh election
results, and the London Mayoral
election, John MacCormick as an
apologist for the Electoral
Commission, and Wendy Alexander
finding the wrong Road to Damascus.
Alex
Salmond was very constructive; he
talked of the strong possibility of
a hung parliament after the next
Westminster election, and his hopes
of a strong SNP presence to extract
the best deal for Scotland. He was
also sad about Ken Livingstone’s
defeat, as he is an old friend, but
stated he would be happy enough to
work with Boris Johnston; Alex used
the phrase “happy to work with
anyone who was democratically
elected”.
I was surprised to see John
MacCormick from the Electoral
Commission; he was supposed to
chair a Fringe Meeting at the SNP
Conference in Edinburgh last month,
but was unable to be there. (It was
rumoured that he was at the wedding
of Jack MacConnell’s daughter that
day, but that might have been a
canard.) He was quizzed as to why
the Electoral Commission had not
referred the case of Wendy
Alexander to the Procurator Fiscal;
he said that the chief punishment
for an illegal donation was that it
had to be returned, and it had been
(after they were found out), that
Ms Alexander had taken all
reasonable steps, and that there was
no intention to deceive. Quite how
this judgment was arrived at when
all of Ms Alexander’s donations were
kept under the £1,000 limit to keep
them from being declared is not
clear.
Interviewer Glenn Campbell was
fairly incisive, but he was not as
incisive as Alex Neil MSP was at the
SNP Fringe Meeting, which Mr
MacCormick unfortunately missed.
Harking back to the SNP Conference,
Deputy First Minister Nicola
Sturgeon made a comment that struck
a chord with me, and with others;
she said “The SNP wants power for a
purpose, compared to New Labour
whose purpose was to get power.”
When Ms Alexander was on the BBC
Politics Show she used her time to
criticise the SNP, exclusively,
without coming up with much
constructive comment. Glenn
Campbell asked her if the subject of
a Referendum on Independence had
been discussed with her colleagues;
she replied that there had been
“tactical discussions”, to which
Glenn Campbell said “Tactical
discussions – this is our country’s
future we are talking about!”
As the interview was drawing to a
close Ms Alexander was asked what
were the big issues she had to put
before the electorate, “We have to
reorganise the Labour Party in
Scotland” she asserted! Now what
did Nicola Sturgeon say about
purpose and power?
The
Wrong Road to Damascus
If general observers of the Scottish
political scene are mystified by the
antics of Ms Alexander, the leader
of the Labour MSPs, think how her
own cohorts must be feeling? She
has been steadfast in her defence of
the Union, even going so far as to
get into bed with the Tories and the
Liberals with a “Commission” to
review the Scotland Act, which
categorically excludes Independence,
and now she pops up with a call for
a Referendum on Independence!
Her
colleagues – I hesitate to call them
friends- are no doubt aghast at how
quickly she has conceded the pass;
she was bitterly anti - Referendum,
then comes the crushing defeats for
Labour in the local government
elections in England and Wales, and
the loss of London to the Tories,
and she is off on another road. Her
Unionist allies, Tory and Liberal,
have had the Commissionary rug
pulled from beneath their feet as
well, without as much as a by your
leave. I am reminded of a comment I
made at the time of Clause 2a, which
prompted a Referendum sponsored by
Brian Souter (Maybe that’s why she
hates him); I said then that Ms
Alexander had been a management
consultant, and having proved that
she was unable to manage, she then
proved that she was unable to
consult either. Plus ca change.
She has become the victim of the law
of unintended consequences, because
she has now conceded a Referendum
on Independence. The timing of
this is not the issue, except in her
own eyes. Having been implacably
opposed to a Referendum, she has now
accepted that there should be one,
so now we have both Government and
the main opposition party agreed on
a Referendum; of course, the devil
is in the detail, and in the
timing. Ms Alexander has been
shouting about the SNP’s manifesto
commitments; the SNP had a manifesto
commitment to hold the referendum in
2010, and sees no reason to alter
the timetable.
So let’s be very clear, a favourite
saying in politics these days –
Wendy Alexander has been implacably
opposed, as a matter of principle,
to an Independence Referendum. We
understand that view, we understand
principles; what we fail to
understand is why she has done a
complete U turn and is now calling
for an Independence Referendum now.
Could it be that matters of
principle are always subject to
Labour’s ambitions for itself, and
thus do not count?
I have just watched Wendy Alexander
on Newsnight Scotland, and I am not
clear what she is proposing; I
understand very clearly that she
wants to damage the SNP, and thinks
that this is a jolly good wheeze.
Fiddling about with the future of
your country for short term
political gain is totally
despicable.
FIRST MINISTER’S QUESTIONS
Last
week I was in the Parliament for
First Minister’s Questions, which I
try to attend as often as possible;
one of our MSPs told me that Alex
Salmond was ill, and that Nicola
Sturgeon would be taking the
Questions. I said “Perhaps there
will not be the same antagonism
between Nicola and Wendy Alexander”,
to which I got the response, with a
raised eyebrow “You think so?”
In the event, as the world and his
brother – and sister- now know, it
was a decidedly one sided contest,
and in the unkind words of Ian Bell,
writing in the Herald, “Nicola wiped
the floor with Wendy”. There are a
few thoughts flowing from this
episode; in the first place Ms
Alexander’s questions were batted
aside because the SNP Government
team had done their homework, so she
was hit with facts. Secondly, our
Deputy far outclasses their head
honcho, and thirdly if Alex Salmond
falls under a bus then the
succession is safe. The SNP has
quality.
Clamjamfray

Donnie MacNeill
Whose oil is it anyway?
Panic from pumps to
parliament! What a stooshie over a
pension scheme, or was that just an
excuse for a trade union to try its
luck and take advantage of a
government that’s flapping about
like a fish on a trawler’s deck?
The whole Grangemouth
affair has highlighted our
dependency on oil and raised, again,
the question of ownership of the
black gold. Certainly, Alex Salmond
was calmness personified in the face
of the approaching armageddon,
invented it has to be said, in the
news rooms of the Scottish media.
His Westminster counterparts, no
doubt mindful of the loss of tax
revenue and the upcoming local
elections in Englandshire, were
flapping about like….well, you know!
The
one person who got it right was
Steve Camley in his cartoon in the
Herald, with the Dear Leader
sporting a lapel bearing the
message, “It’s our oil crisis”. The
only crisis we have is in the
ticking of the clock towards the day
when our North Sea reserves run out.
Without independence, we will have
had little or no benefit from all
the years of its extraction, apart
that is, from the financing of the
destruction of our steel, coal
mining, shipbuilding and fishing
industries.
How much is a barrel
of Brent crude worth? At current
market prices, ten supplementary
benefit payments and a post office
closure!
Wonder Woman
And at this time of
national uncertainty, what was the
leader of her Britannic Majesty’s
Labour Opposition in the Scottish
parliament anxious to ask the First
Minister at FMQ? Not what he was
doing to help resolve the dispute;
not what difference independence
(sorry, ‘separatism’) would have
made to the situation; not even if
the Prime Minister had called or
written! Oh no, Wendy was anxious to
know if some people had more
privileged access to his supreme
being than others.
Well, no one has more
direct access to the FM than she,
and does she know how to misuse it?!
Wendy was supposed to
be Labour’s Wonder Woman, and quite
apt the title is too. Every week her
colleagues wonder what kind of mess
she will make of her questions in
the chamber, whilst she must wonder
how long it will be before Brutus
Kerr and his cohorts start
sharpening the knives. She must also
be wondering just what she has to do
to get one over on the First
Minister!
It’s a wonder she can
sleep at night!
Floating Bets
Along with seventy three other
inveterate nationalists, your
intrepid scribe was out on the drink
the other week. Well, I hear you
say, what’s so unusual about that in
the SNP? The ‘drink’ in this case
was the Forth Estuary and the
occasion was the third Casino Cruise
organised by the ubiquitous Gordon
MacDonald the treasurer of the
Livingston SNP CA. As always, Gordon
had organised everything, including
the weather, to perfection and a
great night was had by all,
including Ian Hudghton who had come
down from Forfar allegedly for the
sail, though I did notice that he
was a dab hand on the tables.
Obviously he has learned some useful
things during his time as an MEP in
Brussels! Seriously, he is tireless
in his support for the party at all
levels - and all over the country.
In the spirit of impartiality, I
should mention that the event also
had the support of Alex Orr and
Grant Thoms, who would both like to
have the chance to go to Belgium and
learn to play the tables as
skilfully as Ian!
As the evening wore
on, I got to reflecting, as the
chips disappeared from the baize in
front of me faster than labour
voters at the polls, that this was
the way to enjoy politics and to
raise funds, without recourse to the
dubious services of Lord Levy and
his affluent associates.
My dear chum and
fellow clansman, Angus Brendan, the
Barra sheep-tamer, would have been
hard pushed, however, to get the Met
interested in anything on board.
Except, perhaps, the two West
Lothian Councillors, later to star
at the end of the Spring Conference,
who appeared on the quayside with
what looked suspiciously like big
violin cases! One can only assume
that they were to be used to carry
home the remnants of an excellent
buffet, or some of the multitude of
raffle prizes on offer.
Fire Alert
We
have had a little local difficulty
in West Lothian with the downgrading
of fire cover for the fastest
growing area in the Lothians. For
some reason, local campaigners, who
are also SNP members, were not
allowed to hand out leaflets at the
Spring Conference. These were only
to highlight the issue, which will
eventually affect the whole of
Scotland, and to encourage people to
sign the e-petition going in front
of the Scottish Parliament. Do your
patriotic duty and log onto
http://epetitions.scottish.parliament.uk/view_petition.asp?PetitionID=224
And do it now, before
you have to call out a fire tender
that isn’t there!!