|
CAMPAIGNING FOR SCOTLAND
(Owned, Edited and Printed in Scotland since November
1926)
"Promoting all that is best in Scottish
Nationalism and all that is best in Scotland."
Content of the Flag in the Wind Web Site is the copyright of the Scots
Independent Newspaper.
[
Issue 368 - 22nd June 2007] |
 Compiled by Richard Thomson |
Lots of great information to
read and enjoy under our
Features Section:
Scots
Language | Scottish Food |
Dates in History |
Scot Wit and lots more
School's
Out
I was tasked with showing a group of Primary Sixes round Holyrood last week.
I’ve never really considered myself to be all that old, but I guess it’s all
in the eye of the beholder if the musical ‘Good-mor-ning-Mis-ter-Thom-son’
they greeted me with was anything to go by :-)
Not
having any kids of my own, I’m never very sure how to pitch things to
children. You don’t want to bore them, but equally, make it too simple and
they’ll have you for breakfast. Luckily, though, this lot had been studying
the Scottish Parliament, and were about to hold their own mock elections. I
say luckily, but once they had been shown round and we were waiting for
First Minister’s Questions to finish so that Shona Robison could join us,
they had some pretty penetrating questions to ask me:
Who’s the best MSP? – “Er... It's hard to say. Some make good
speeches, some are good in the committees, others are good at constituency
work. Everybody brings something to the place in their own way”.
Is Alex Salmond the best MSP? – “He’s very good, but as the First
Minister he does a different job to all the other MSPs, so it’s quite hard
to compare, really”.
Do MSPs have any fun? – “Well, it’s hard work, but they do sometimes
get a good laugh in the chamber if someone says something daft or funny".
Do MSPs get jealous of each other? – “Um.. Good question. They’re
just ordinary people, so I suppose they must!”
How much does Alex Salmond get paid? – “Oh, about £120,000. More than
me, anyway. Probably more than your teacher as well!”
How much do you get paid? – “Erm… I’m not sure. More than I did for
my first paper round, anyway…”
So what do you do? – “I’m a researcher for Shona Robison, the lady
who’s your MSP. I write speeches and meet people for her and things like
that”
(I kid you not) Does that mean you do all the work, and she gets all the
credit? – [Nervous laugh] “Er, no. Did you know that Shona had to be up
before 5 this morning to get to work?”
Fortunately, when Shona arrived, they still had plenty questions left. And
did the same boy who asked whether I did all the work not follow up straight
away by asking whether or not I was a good assistant? Shona, ever the pro,
answered that all of her assistants did different jobs, and that all of
them, myself included, did them very well. I’ll buy her a glass of wine for
that reply before I head off to London.
I predict a bright future ahead in politics or journalism for that boy if he
wants one. However, by far the best question of the day came earlier on from
from a wee girl, who on seeing Brian Taylor getting ready for the cameras,
asked innocently if the lady applying his make-up was his personal beauty
therapist. I’ll never be able to watch Brian again in quite the same light…
The Worst Small Country in the World?
Jack will be disappointed. It seems that despite all the marketing boasts
which greet passengers at our airports, Scotland might not be the best
(small) country in the world after all.
The Federation of Small Business has produced a report comparing Scotland to
10 other countries with fewer than nine million people, including Norway,
Iceland and the Republic of Ireland. The measures compared included data on
economic performance, employment rates, health and education. Scotland's
poor life expectancy was a major factor in coming bottom.

In socio-economic terms, Scotland is like the curate's egg. The wealth
enjoyed by Edinburgh, West Lothian, Perthshire and Aberdeen is not matched
in much of west central Scotland. There's no doubt that perceived poor life
opportunities and a general lack of care for personal wellbeing is a huge
factor in our less than optimal economic performance. Nicolas Crafts of the
London School of Economics sketches it starkly when he estimates that if
Scotland simply matched English life expectancy, our GDP would increase by
over 20%.
However, Scottish GDP is already fairly high, reaching £111bn once oil is
factored in (this takes public spending as a share of GDP down to c. 41%, in
contrast to the oft-cited figure of 50%). These figures would, on the 2003
OECD figures, make an independent Scotland the 8th richest country in the
world per capita, sandwiched in between the USA and Sweden. Admittedly, a
relatively static population massages the GDP per head figure somewhat, but
you get the idea. Problems we may have, but a basket case we certainly are
not.
There's no need for us to plunge into a collective national gloom over these
indicators. Sure, they make for pretty grim reading, but the opportunity for
us to do better is there. A number of measures can be taken to improve
growth and help rebalance our population profile, such as cutting business
rates and reducing the burden of graduate debt. However, one of the single
most significant measures we could take is to improve the link between
taxation and public spending, by introducing fiscal independence.
We're not a poor country, nor are we subsidised by anyone else. No-one holds
us back, and no-one will prevent us in the longer term from taking the
actions that the other independent nations seem to be able to use to deliver
better life outcomes for their peoples. Taking greater responsibility for
our own affairs, on both personal and governmental levels, is surely the
best way to deal with our unique set of national strengths and weaknesses.
The Noblest Prospect?
Well, the SNP won the election and formed the government, and now the
Scottish political focus will, in part, drift southwards for the general
election. Partly in consequence, although this has been in the planning for
a wee while, I now have a new job with the SNP. In London. I'm delighted,
although I should also make sure that I'm the first to acknowledge the irony
in the situation...
For
a variety of reasons, mostly personal, I've felt for a while that I fancied
a change of scene from Edinburgh. Ever since I started working for Stewart
Hosie, I've been the only SNP Westminster researcher not actually based in
Westminster, which had both advantages and disadvantages.
I've been brooding over a move to work elsewhere for a while now, either for
a job related to politics or a return to finance. However, my progress with
my MBA has been, ahem, sporadic of late. And the one thing I've found since
leaving the financial sector is that by working for first the SNP and then
their parliamentarians, I've enjoyed a hitherto rare engagement with what I
actually do each day. Being able to get out of bed each morning looking
forward to work, is something which it's absolutely impossible to put any
kind of price on. So to get the change of scene but retain the work I enjoy
so much is from my point of view, very fortunate indeed.
Next week will be business as usual, but after that, I'm going to have to
throw myself into the task of letting out my flat and finding somewhere to
stay in London. So, if anyone fancies moving into a spacious flat just yards
from Portobello Beach, or alternatively knows of somewhere in London where I
can move with both a cat and a car, please feel free to get in touch.
The Working Life of Linda
Fabiani MSP

Click here to read SNP MSP Linda Fabiani's working diary.
SYNOPSIS
SNP MEP Welcomes Scotch Whisky Vote
SNP President Ian Hudghton MEP has welcomed today's vote in the European
Parliament on new rules for spirit labelling as an important step in
achieving a secure future for the Scotch Whisky industry.
Mr Hudghton - a member of the Parliament's Internal Market committee - has
been campaigning for the EU to recognise and protect both the name 'Scotch
Whisky' as a distinctive brand and the traditional methods used.
Speaking
after he voted in favour of a compromise deal in Strasbourg, Mr Hudghton
said:
"This could have gone further but I believe we've achieved a good deal that
will help provide a secure future for the Scotch Whisky industry. In
particular, the name 'Scotch Whisky' will be protected as a brand and we
will also have the opportunity to protect use of the name in the Gaelic
language too. The new rules will mean that traditional practices of
producing whisky - which date back centuries - and the world class high
standards of the Scotch Whisky industry will get the recognition they
deserve.
"This is good news for Scotland and our whisky producers and I'm pleased to
have been able to support it. I look forward to having early discussions
with colleagues in Edinburgh on protecting the Gaelic language version of
Scotch Whisky - uisge-beatha Albannach - as a distinctive brand."
Speaking earlier in the parliamentary debate, Mr Hudghton said:
"As a Scots MEP I have an obvious interest in any regulation which relates
to Scotch Whisky. Scotch Whisky is the product of centuries of traditional
practice. The first reference to whisky in Scotland was in 1494-5 according
to Exchequer records, the first taxes were imposed in 1644.
"Protecting the term "Scotch Whisky", as well as the method of production
and the geographic definition, is extremely important for Scotland for
obvious reasons.
"Some details still have to be underlined in the technical files and I look
forward to a successful outcome of that. This compromise, the product of
lengthy and very heated exchanges is something that I now am prepared to
accept."
SNP Question Real Cost of Olympics
SNP MP Pete Wishart has tabled a number of Parliamentary questions to try
and determine the cost to Scotland of London holding the games. Olympic
inspectors are visiting London today to assess the progress so far.
Mr
Wishart said:
“Today I have tabled Parliamentary questions to try and determine how much
Scotland is set to pay for the London Olympics. We already know that our
lottery-supported good causes are to lose out as money is diverted to build
the London infrastructure, but there is likely to be an impact on Scotland's
economy as well.
"In the next few years London is likely to suck up most of the UK’s leading
building firms, contractors, architects and surveyors to build this massive
project. This is likely to happen when Scotland will be looking to embark
upon its own large infrastructure projects.
"I therefore want to know if the Westminster Government has considered this
when planning the construction of the Olympic site. What we need to know is
will there be additional costs to Scotland in securing these projects and is
there a possibility of a future skill shortage
"More and more Tessa Jowell refers to the legacy for London in securing the
games. But it is the rest of the UK that will be paying to secure this
legacy. What we must determine is the true costs to Scotland.” |