Check all the Clans that have DNA Projects. If your Clan is not in the list there's a way for it to be listed.An amazing collection of unique holiday cottages, castles and apartments, all over Scotland in truly amazing locations.

Click here to get a Printer Friendly Page
Scots Place Names
Advertise on all 1000+ pages of the Flag in the Wind
Handmade Gifts


Scots Independent

The Flag in the Wind
A weekly online newspaper bringing you information on the political scene in Scotland: part of the monthly Scots Independent.

 Scottish Flag

Home | About Us | Subscriptions | Archives | Ad Rates | FeaturesLinks  |  Shopping Mall

Take out a newspaper subscription to the Scots Independent newspaper


(Owned, Edited and Printed in Scotland since November 1926)
"Promoting all that is best in Scottish Nationalism and all that is best in Scotland."
Content of the Flag in the Wind Web Site is the copyright of the Scots Independent Newspaper.

[ Issue 738 - 25th July 2014 ]

Compiled by
Jim Lynch


Referendum Thoughts (1)

I have been participating in the Yes campaign, and find it is exhilarating, exciting and enjoyable. The people involved are of all parties and none, all they want is independence. From being wary of people in other parties I find it refreshing to work alongside former opponents. On the doorstep it is normal for your canvassing partner to declare their previous vote and to stress that this is not an election for a political party, but for Scotland – for the right to make our own decisions, and our own mistakes, and the power to change them if we get things wrong.

There is still a hunger for more information, and it is my opinion that people hear what we say, and understand it, but then listen to or read reports put out by the No campaign that directly contradict what we have said. We do not see many No campaigners out in the streets, as they do not exist in any great number and rely on the media to put the case across. As far as the Yes campaign is concerned we are on their doorstep, engaging with them, and asking them to question us; you can shout at a television set or a newspaper, but they can't hear you. The majority we spoke to were interested.


Referendum Thoughts (2)

It is a fact that there is only one mainstream newspaper backing Yes; this is the Sunday Herald which declared its support on 4th May this year. Other papers are reluctant, but have no hesitation in attacking Yes by publishing any statement by the No campaign and its spear carriers without checking. Two recent cases, just two! When the new President of the European Commission, Jean Claude Juncker said he did not envisage any new entrants to the EU for five years the No campaign and its media supporters went into overdrive and the news was splashed everywhere! When the position was clarified that the President had been speaking about Eastern European countries and not about Scotland, to whom he was sympathetic, that did not generate very much coverage. There were no apologies, particularly from the BBC for jumping to wrong conclusions. Never apologise never explain.

The other canard, just the other day was ex Prime Minister and Chancellor Gordon Brown claiming that independence would stop countries participating in transplant transfers; this is completely wrong, as countries do this all the time and the various NHS organisations have resolutely and publicly refuted the prospect. The official agreements in the British Isles also include Ireland. I was never very impressed by Gordon Brown, either as Chancellor or Prime Minister, but I did not rate him a fool. His eager publishing of the item on transplants would therefore suggest he could be a knave.

Referendum Thoughts (3)

There are two basic reasons for the above attitudes, and they are interlinked. Westminster is absolutely desperate to keep hold of the money from North Sea oil. They dissembled about its very existence, created a Continental Shelf to hide the money, and by some financial wizardry managed to squander untold billions of pounds in oil money, and created the biggest fiscal and economic crisis in my life time; I am 79 years old. Every action they take and every word they speak is directed towards that aim, and no blows are too low.

So for over 40 years they have had the oil money, wasted it, and put aside nothing for a rainy day; the only two countries in the world which have not created an oil fund for future generations are the United Kingdom, and Iraq.

The second reason is directly related to the first; it is Trident. Without the existence of Trident, the United Kingdom would no longer be justified in having a seat on the United Nations Security Council, and if it lost the revenue from North Sea oil it could not afford Trident.. This would stop Mr Cameron, the present Prime Minister poncing around the world with a concerned expression on his face. The Russians and the Chinese pay no attention to minnows.


Scotland and the Atlantic Margin

Bill McLaughlin

We are publishing detailed research by Bill McLaughlin of the oil and gas resources in Scottish waters. The scope and extent of this is amazing, and we are grateful to Bill for assembling all this information together. It can be accessed at Atlantic Margin and will now be available at the click of a mouse.

Any queries or more information please contact Bill McLaughlin at


One time supporter of independence

At the beginning of this month we should have congratulated the United States of America on the anniversary of their Declaration of Independence. They had to fight a bloody war with the United Kingdom to get their independence.

I am now tempted to qualify that congratulation: it is a matter of sadness that the self same United States, through its democratically elected President, is opposed to this ancient nation following the same star. Of course, their concern is at the proposed loss of their Yankee Poodle Dandy, the UK, custodians of the nuclear submarines, which are armed and paid for by the UK; I use the word custodians deliberately, since while the UK picks up the tab for these monstrosities, and Scotland bears the risk of housing the largest nuclear arsenal in Europe the UK cannot use them as America has the keys. America also decided where they were to be put; Harold Macmillan wanted them to be at Lochinver, but Eisenhower stipulated the Holy Loch, just beside Glasgow. That’s what is meant by a special relationship. I was also intrigued the other day to see that we had some based in Loch Ewe.

Payroll vote

In the closing days of last month we saw a debate on TV between Jim Sillars and Michael Forsyth – which Jim won handsomely - and an appeal in the Herald by Jack MacConnell and Jim Wallace.

The Better Together trio, Forsyth, MacConnell and Wallace are all of course members of the unelected House of Lords, and an independent Scotland will have no truck with that institution. I have seen elsewhere that it is the largest parliamentary body in the world, apart from the People’s Congress of Beijing. Both bodies are unelected, just appointed, and I would hazard a guess that the expenses and other goodies of the House of Lords are not replicated in Beijing. I speculate idly on how these “noble” lords will survive after independence; will rUk happily shell out the first class travel and other expenses (£300 a day for just signing in, I have heard) or will they try to bill the Scottish Parliament for that? After hearing some of their scare stories, will they have to pass Border controls when returning from their away days, perhaps being strip searched – the mind boggles!

They want to continue as fat cats, no question of where their votes will go; just think, they can vote against independence but no one has voted for them to hold their exalted positions. I cannot quite understand what it is they do, but judging from the state of things they don’t do it very well. There are 650 Members of the UK Parliament and heading for 850 members of the House of Lords. (That includes 26 – or is it now 27 – Church of England bishops. Nae rabbis, nae imams, nae Catholic bishops). Power and privilege to the fore for the unelected Elect. However they have to support No, as they would lose their fat sinecures if Scotland votes Yes.

Come to think of it, that might be a rather large saving to the Scottish Public Purse, as we would be rid of these subsidy junkies. Worthy members of Johann Lamont’s “Something for nothing” elite.

Jimmy Halliday’s contributions to the Cause


Jimmy Halliday – lifetime Nationalist

To put matters into context, in 1955 the SNP contested only two Parliamentary seats in Scotland. Dr Robert McIntyre fought Perth and East Perthshire and Jimmy Halliday fought Stirling and Falkirk Burghs.  Jimmy then became the youngest ever SNP Chairman and served 1956-70; in 1956 the entire SNP Conference delegates were photographed on the steps of the Allan Water Hotel, Bridge of Allan.

There will be a Referendum for Scottish Independence this year, which was unthinkable in the dark days of 1955.  Jimmy died on 3rd January 2013 at the age of 85, and we will be publishing all his articles in the Scots Independent, all those we have electronic input for. It is anticipated we will publish a book with all his contributions over many years but this will have to wait until after the Referendum.


A little bit of SI history. When the Scots Independent became a private company in 1957, the first four directors were Dr Robert McIntyre, SNP President, James Halliday, SNP Chairman, David Rollo, SNP Treasurer and John Smart, SNP Secretary. In this picture Jim Lynch, SI Editor is introduced to John Smart by James Halliday; in the background is Kenneth Fee, previous editor. This photo was taken by Donnie MacNeill at the SNP Conference in Perth in October 2010


 “Yes we can” should now be “Why ever not?”

James Halliday

Everyone who has ever borne a torch received it from someone

Above all, let us now rejoice. Our barely credible victory has done wonders for our people's confidence and for their future prospects. All who now look in our direction will do so with a greater interest in, and appreciation of, Scotland; and with a degree of respect which the subordinate centuries have seen diminish.

When like-minded people gather together on formal occasions they usually call upon all present to acknowledge "Absent Friends". In this moment of success we remember the many who never knew the joy of today. You all have memories of those who encouraged you into our ranks----Arthur Donaldson and Billy Wolfe of course, and where were you when Winnie won Hamilton?

Someone has said that this campaign was 20 years in the making. Make that 65 rather than 20. With the end of the war in 1945 there began a modification, if not quite an ending, of the siege-induced Britishness of the war years, and a new Scottish awareness revived. If today we are all to a degree torch-bearers, let us remember that everyone who has ever borne a torch received it from someone. So I choose to honour as Absent Friends Robert McIntyre and John MacCormick.

Gratitude is due as well to Present Friends, Thanks to all campaigners in all corners of our country. Activists and candidates, winners or losers, all contributed to the surge of spirit which brought victory. All of us have been splendidly served by our professional staff. Peter Murrell, and all who keep Headquarters responsive and helpful to all us members, deserve congratulations on having made our greatest day organisationally possible. Knowing now of the extent of proven expert support available to the Party, we might all be wise to re-think our own role in the future. Well-meaning members have never been slow to offer their opinions and advice. Their voices, loyal and persistent, but faint in their total volume, are now surpassed by the sounds made by the confident Government of an awakened people. The Scots Independent must learn humility in this presence. In offering opinions, ideas and attempts at guidance, we must now realise that our leaders and their advisers are likely to be there before us.

Take one example. A few years ago I remarked that, in my view, the Party's best-ever slogan was "Yes We Can". Alex Salmond expressed delight because, as he explained, that had been his choice. No one will believe it, but it is true, and capable of dated proof, that we used that slogan before Senator Obama became President. It's not nearly so snappy, but we might now follow "Yes We Can" with Why ever Not?" It is for our opponents to find the answer to that question. Interestingly, the old shop-soiled, threadbare, discredited arguments are coming, not from MSPs or ex-MSPs, but from MPs. Some defeated opponents showed unexpected grace and courtesy in defeat. I think in particular of Andy Kerr who came before the cameras with admirable dignity. No doubt he will be among those ridiculed and patronised as "losers" by their MP colleagues. Certainly, even MPs have not as yet returned to the old reliable too wee, too poor, too stupid parrot speech, but be assured they will. Meantime they favour the greater subtlety of "Scots don't want independence". Or they attempt to campaign by vocabulary, drivelling about break-up, divorce, separation all in tones of terror and horror.

Another antique has been proffered by mighty Anne McGuire who has spoken of "our" link to the top class of international relations; of "our" seat at NATO; "our" leadership in the European Union; "our" veto at the UN Security Council, and "our" role in the G20". All these", she mourns "would be lost". Why she thinks that the word "our" accurately applies to all these blessings, only someone with some skill in grammar might hope to explain. Another frightful spectre from 1950s arguments ----the British National Debt--- has been brought forth to terrify any Scot insolent enough to form opinions on economics. So much nonsense and so much misinformation and deception. But there are some genuine, serious and sometimes even honest doubts which we must counter.

There is a modest but tenacious Unionist sentiment still in Scotland. Some of it is rooted in sectarian feeling but much of it comes especially from older people, rural or suburban and in personally comfortable circumstances who still feel British pride which was once so much more widespread. In their Unionism they will be joined by some from the Labour side who are genuinely or professedly impressed by Mr Jim Murphy's thesis that patriotism and nationalism are to be seen as contrasts. This one, as they say, will run and run. Mr Murphy, a dogged as well as foxy person, will see to that.

As arguments continue we can feel total confidence in our leaders. They will see, as we do, that Scotland is still ruled by a party which has one MP, even if camouflaged by a sad squad of Liberal accomplices. Such a situation is forever unjustifiable and intolerable. And if, like Mr Gray, you want to make it stop, use your political power to free Scotland and thus guarantee no more Tory government which so offends you.

Find us on facebook at

Scots Independent newspaper



We're on twitter too!/SI1926


Read Christina McKelvie MSP's Weekly Diary


Newsnet Scotland
Reporting Scotland's news, as it happens





Monday 21 July 2014

SNP MSP for Clydesdale, Aileen Campbell has welcomed figures that show Scottish food and drink sales have increased by more than £500 million across Britain since 2007.

According to the latest figures of grocery purchases from the Scottish Government, the Scottish food and drink industry has seen a sales increase of over thirty-six per cent in the seven year period.

Between May 2007 and May 2014, the estimated value of retail sales of Scottish brands rose by 36.6 per cent (£513 million) to £1.914 billion in Britain.

Aileen Campbell MSPCommenting, Aileen said:

“Clydesdale is home to some of Scotland’s shining stars in the food and drink industry including Border Biscuits, Ramsay of Carluke, Clyde Valley Tomatoes, Scott’s Jam and Strathaven Ales, to name a few. All of these brands do an excellent job of putting Clydesdale on the national map and Scotland on the world map!

“The upcoming referendum provides an exciting opportunity to enhance Scotland’s booming food and drink industry. A Yes vote will allow Scotland to make an even stronger mark on the international food and drink scene – with independence, government commitment to improving the industry will only strengthen.”

Scotland’s Cabinet Secretary for Rural Affairs, Food and the Environment, Richard Lochhead said:

“Business is booming for Scottish food and drink, not just here in Scotland but across these islands and around the world.

“Our global reputation for top quality food and drink with unrivalled provenance is driving up sales of iconic Scottish brands and products at home and further afield – as demonstrated by the strong and increasing demand for Scottish food and drink brands in England and Wales.

“This continued growth in these markets – especially in the past year as we get closer to the referendum – shows that consumers across these islands purchase our produce on the basis of taste and quality above all else.

“The phenomenal success of Scotland’s food and drink sector is a direct result of the strong partnership between the Scottish Government, our agencies and industry - and we continue to do all we can to promote Scotland’s amazing array of food and drink to further sales in key markets. The Showcasing Scotland event is just one example of this, using the fantastic opportunity offered by the Glasgow 2014 Commonwealth Games to promote Scotland as a land of food and drink.

“With independence, food and drink exports will continue to be a priority area for Scotland’s international trade efforts. With our overseas representation dedicated solely to Scotland’s own priorities we can promote our products to the world and tackle barriers to trade that the Westminster Government does not prioritise.”

Monday 21 Jul 2014

Dave Thompson MSP for Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch has welcomed the next phase of the Scottish Government’s Digital Superfast Broadband Programme and expressed delight that the new initiative will mean new exchange areas in the Highlands, including in Beauly and Corpach.

Dave Thompson MSPThe Digital Scotland Superfast Broadband initiative consists of two projects, one of which is dedicated to the Highlands and Islands. The Digital Scotland Superfast Broadband programme aims to provide fibre broadband infrastructure to areas not covered by commercial deployment and combined with commercial roll-out plans, expects that 95% of premises in Scotland will have access to fibre broadband by the end of 2017/18.

Commenting on this Mr Thompson said:

“It is tremendous news that rural Scotland is set to benefit from this high speed technology and that certain areas in the Highlands will be experiencing this for this the first time. This will mean locals, tourists and businesses alike will soon reap the benefits of high quality digital connectivity”.

Dave went on:

“Ensuring that our digital infrastructure is effective will mean communities and businesses will benefit economically and the improved service will also provide enjoyment for those who access the internet for recreational purposes”.

He finished with:

“I hope this progress continues so that one day we may be able to lay claim to being part of a country that facilitates superfast broadband no matter where you are, whether that be in a tower block or on a remote Island, with Scotland wide coverage being the ultimate aim”.

The public sector investment in the Highlands and Islands project is £126.4m. It is being delivered through the Scottish Government broadband fund, which incorporates funding from Broadband Delivery UK (BDUK), and also includes up to £12m from HIE’s own budget. BT is contributing £19.4 million in addition to its commercial investment in the region.

The Highlands and Islands project is led by Highlands and Islands Enterprise and includes the following local authority areas: Highland, Moray, Orkney Islands, Shetland Islands, Eilean Siar (Western Isles), parts of Argyll and Bute and part of North Ayrshire (Islands).

Information on the Digital Scotland Programme can be found here:

Tuesday 22nd July 2014

The SNP has today highlighted the findings of a report by the Audience Council Scotland – the BBC Trust’s advisory body – and said that the corporation should provide detailed plans for how it intends to address the issues raised.

The Audience Council Scotland’s report raised a number of serious issues – pointing out that audiences in Scotland feel important Scottish issues and stories “continue to be underexposed on network news”.

The report also stated that “members noted a long-term issue for the BBC about how accurate and impartial it was to broadcast programmes reflecting the political culture of one nation across the whole of the UK.”

The SNP has previously expressed concern that job losses and cuts at BBC Scotland could adversely impact the quality of the corporation’s output – and lead to a poorer product for BBC viewers in Scotland. Only last week the BBC announced plans to cut another 415 jobs by 2016/17.

Commenting, SNP MSP Stewart Maxwell said:

Stewart Maxwell MSP“Today’s report is a timely reminder of the BBC’s responsibilities to viewers in Scotland as a public broadcaster – and raises a number of serious concerns which the BBC simply can’t ignore.

“Job losses at the BBC have been a particular concern for some time – it is absolutely unacceptable for these cuts to lead to a poorer service for viewers. Now more than ever it is vitally important for people in Scotland to have access to quality, impartial news coverage.

“The BBC Trust has already said it will work with the BBC to address the issues raised by the Audience Council – but these issues are too important to kick into the long grass.

“The BBC should come up with detailed plans on how it intends to address these issues – and ensure that viewers in Scotland get the first-class public broadcasting service they deserve.”

Notes to editors

The Audience Council Scotland’s report is reported here:


The most recent BBC jobs cuts are reported here:

Sunday 20 July 2014

The SNP is today welcoming reports backing the common sense approach to an independent Scotland's EU membership.

Angus Robertson MPScotland on Sunday reports today that Scotland’s EU membership would be treated as a “separate and special case” – set apart from non-member countries currently in the queue - and thus would negotiate member state status from within after a Yes vote in the referendum.
The newspaper was told by a high ranking EU official that European Commission President Jean -Claude Juncker himself – a former Prime Minister of Luxembourg – would be “sympathetic as someone who is from a smaller country”.

The report points out that Scotland is currently signed up to “core EU requirements”.
The development comes at the end of a week which saw the No camp distort comments Mr Juncker made on EU enlargement, which led to his spokesperson confirming to the BBC that he was not referring to Scotland.

Repeated No camp attempts to scaremonger on Europe are made all the more ridiculous as new UK Defence Secretary Philip Hammond today confirmed he is still in favour of ripping the UK out of Europe.
SNP Westminster leader Angus Robertson said:

“This welcome report confirms what we already knew – as a current member of the EU, Scotland will be treated as a ‘separate and special case’, and will negotiate our member state status from within.
“The No campaign's credibility is in tatters as their scares on Europe are laid bare. Just days ago they were caught trying to twist Mr Juncker’s words – which led to his spokesperson stepping in to make clear his comments were not about Scotland. But No apology was made by Alistair Darling, and it should be now.

“Over the past weeks and months we have seen No camp's scare stories on currency and other issues crumble to dust. Their desperate attempts to claim that – after over 40 years of membership - Scotland would somehow be excluded from the European Union have been exposed for the absolute nonsense that they are.

“The irony is that while the No camp scaremonger about an independent Scotland, Westminster is dancing to UKIP’s tune as it gears up to rip the UK out of Europe. Defence Secretary Philip Hammond confirmed today that he is still in favour of an EU exit. The hypocrisy of their arguments is tying the No camp in knots.

“Scotland’s future in Europe is only secure with a Yes vote."



Download our windows screensaver
Download our Windows Screensaver here!

The Scots Independent Newspaper is independent of the Scottish National Party, but we support the Party in its drive for Independence; while space precludes us commenting on all the issues raised by the 69 MSPs, 6 MPs and 2 MEPs and the Party Office Bearers, we have provided a link to the SNP Website.

The Flag in the Wind would welcome your feedback on what you think of this weekly service. If you have any comments or suggestions simply e-mail them to

Content of the Flag in the Wind is the copyright of the Scots Independent Newspaper which has been owned, edited and printed in Scotland since November 1926.